Repository navigation
gh-161608: Mention frozendict in the expressions reference - #161612
Open
nilayp-codes wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
nilayp-codes wants to merge 1 commit into
nilayp-codes wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Member
|
The CLA must be signed by a humna. |
picnixz
marked this pull request as draft
November 8, 2026 14:17
Documentation build overview
|
picnixz
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 8, 2026 14:21
Author
|
Hi, I’m the contributor. I signed the CLA myself just now. Happy to make any changes you’d like. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
frozendict(PEP 814) wasn't listed whereDoc/reference/expressions.rstenumerates built-in mappings and containers. This adds it to the mapping comparison rule, the membership-test list and the list of containers that are false when empty. The optional note about binary arithmetic operators in the issue is left for a separate change.