[feature] add non-exhausive URI validation

Succeeds:

Suggestions are welcome:

Lines 24 to 41 in cdc987d

    
           @validator 
        
           def uri(value: str, /): 
        
               """Return whether or not given value is a valid URI. 
        
               Examples: 
        
                   >>> uri('mailto:example@domain.com') 
        
                   # Output: True 
        
                   >>> uri('file:path.txt') 
        
                   # Output: ValidationError(func=uri, ...) 
        
               Args: 
        
                   value: 
        
                       URI to validate. 
        
               Returns: 
        
                   (Literal[True]): If `value` is a valid URI. 
        
                   (ValidationError): If `value` is an invalid URI. 
        
               """

are you taking any new suggestions?

Constructive ones, please go ahead.

--- # Define a list of valid URI schemes => VALID_SCHEMES = ['http', 'https', 'ftp', 'mailto', 'file']

We could make the parameter-> value(str) flexible perhaps not restrict it to a type str, could be src/path/to/file; which could contain different urls
do a recursive search(regex expression perhaps) to match pattern

is it something we should do?

Something similar yeah.

can I take up the challenge :)?

Sure, go ahead.

@yozachar

Hey @yozachar ,can we use socket.inet_aton(ip) in python to validate ip addresses as a function then update the schema in uri.py?

   # URL-based schemes
    if any(
        value.startswith(item + "://") for item in {
            "ftp", "ftps", "git", "http", "https",
            "irc", "rtmp", "rtmps", "rtsp", "sftp",
            "ssh", "telnet", "gopher", "ldap", "sip",
            "nfs", "mqtt", "smb", "udp"
        }
    ):

IP addresses are already validated in ip_address.py. Why use socket.inet_aton?

Hi, that is cool I looked at the message thread, something about this error below , was why I thought this feature was asked for I guess, see code below.

import validators

streamurl = "rtmp://192.168.1.123:1935/live/test"
print(validators.url(streamurl))

Output:
ValidationError(func=url, args={'value': 'rtmp://192.168.1.123:1935/live/test'})

Or does it mean we just want to validate other schemas? like the ones few ones below, that I could not find in uri.py

proposed schemas

"Uri":  {
"udp": udp://192.168.1.1:1234/path;param=value?,

"gopher": gopher://gopher.example.com/1/path;type=1?search#frag,\
"ldap": ldap://ldap.example.com/cn=John%20Doe,dc=example,dc=com;scope=one?sn#frag, \
"sip":sip://user:password@sip.example.com/path;transport=tcp?subject=Hello#frag, \
"smb": smb://fileserver.example.com/share/path;param=value?query=1#fragment\
 }

Few Thoughts

Have a regex expression : that complies the schema above.
uri_regrex: re.compile()
e.g

  # Validate using regex for URL-based schemes
    if uri_regex.match(value):
        return True

Navigation Menu

[feature] add non-exhausive URI validation #352

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

	@validator
	def uri(value: str, /):
	"""Return whether or not given value is a valid URI.

	Examples:
	>>> uri('mailto:example@domain.com')
	# Output: True
	>>> uri('file:path.txt')
	# Output: ValidationError(func=uri, ...)

	Args:
	value:
	URI to validate.

	Returns:
	(Literal[True]): If `value` is a valid URI.
	(ValidationError): If `value` is an invalid URI.
	"""

[feature] add non-exhausive URI validation #352

Description

Activity

tofetpuzo commented on Jun 23, 2024

nandgator commented on Jun 24, 2024

tofetpuzo commented on Jun 24, 2024

tofetpuzo commented on Jun 26, 2024

nandgator commented on Jun 27, 2024

tofetpuzo commented on Jul 3, 2024

nandgator commented on Jul 4, 2024

tofetpuzo commented on Jul 9, 2024

nandgator commented on Jul 10, 2024

tofetpuzo commented on Jul 10, 2024

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions