Skip to content

StringLiteral to IntegerType/LongType silently truncates fractional strings, changing predicate meaning #4382

Open

Description

@Shahzeb-DataEngineer

Apache Iceberg version

0.12.0 (latest release)

Please describe the bug 🐞

literal("2.6").to(IntegerType()) returns LongLiteral(2) instead of raising, while DecimalLiteral(Decimal("2.6")).to(IntegerType()) raises ValueError. A bound predicate such as x < "2.6" on an int column therefore becomes x < 2 and wrongly drops rows with x = 2 (verified with expression_evaluator); the same bound literal feeds partition pruning, so files can be skipped too.

The sibling DecimalLiteral.to(IntegerType/LongType) already rejects fractional values via the existing _to_integral helper, with a test spelling out why: rounding would change the predicate (e.g. x > 2.6 becoming x > 3 drops x = 3). The StringLiteral path was missed. The reference Java implementation has no INTEGER/LONG case in StringLiteral.to() and refuses the conversion.

Suggested fix: use the existing _to_integral helper in both StringLiteral.to(IntegerType) and StringLiteral.to(LongType), and update test_string_literal to expect ValueError for fractional strings.

Reproduction (pyiceberg 0.12.0, main @ fce8185):

  • literal("2.6").to(IntegerType()) returns LongLiteral(2); same for LongType
  • literal("-2.5").to(IntegerType()) returns LongLiteral(-2); literal("0.1").to(LongType()) returns LongLiteral(0)
  • LessThan("x", "2.6") bound to an int column becomes x < 2, and expression_evaluator returns False for a row with x = 2, although x < 2.6 is True
  • Integral strings still convert exactly: literal("2.0").to(IntegerType()) returns 2, literal("1e3").to(IntegerType()) returns 1000

Willingness to contribute

  • I can contribute a fix for this bug independently
  • I would be willing to contribute a fix for this bug with guidance from the Iceberg community
  • I cannot contribute a fix for this bug at this time

Activity

  1. SurenderguliaEnginner commented on Nov 15, 2026

    @SurenderguliaEnginner

    Hi @Shahzeb-DataEngineer, I'd like to work on this and submit a PR if you aren't already working on it!

  2. Shahzeb-DataEngineer commented on Nov 15, 2026

    @Shahzeb-DataEngineer
    ContributorAuthor

    Hi @SurenderguliaEnginner, thanks for offering! I already have a fix in progress, PR #4383 is open for this. Appreciate it though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions