Skip to content

feat(inspect): add manifests metadata table - #1121

Draft
manuzhang wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
manuzhang:codex/manifests-metadata-table-20261115
Draft

manuzhang wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
manuzhang:codex/manifests-metadata-table-20261115

Conversation

@manuzhang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Depends on #1120 for shared snapshot metadata scan support. Apply that prerequisite when building this draft; merge it first, then rebase this branch onto main. Each feature patch has been verified to apply cleanly to the prerequisite.

Add ManifestsTable through Table::Inspect(MetadataTableKind::kManifests). Rows expose manifest paths, content, sizes, spec/snapshot IDs, nullable data/delete file counts, and readable partition summaries.

Scans use the shared snapshot task and reader APIs, retain their metadata/projection/FileIO, and support reordered or empty whole-column projections and configurable batch sizes. Partition bounds recover dropped source-column types from retained schema history, including identity/truncate transforms and numeric promotion. Partition types are cached per spec within a scan.

Extracted from #876. This patch contains this table, its registrations, and its focused tests; FilesTable and PartitionsTable are separate feature patches.

Validation with the shared-support prerequisite applied: all 79 metadata tests and C++20 compatibility passed. Pre-commit on this exact feature branch and diff checks passed. The feature-specific code and factory were compiled and linked against the independently built prerequisite.

Add the manifests metadata table and its focused tests. Depends on the shared snapshot metadata scan support prerequisite.

Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 14, 2026 16:40

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants